Projection
|
Robinson
|
Mercator
|
Azimuthal
|
Include a picture of
it
|
|
|
|
Purpose
|
Show
the globe on a flat image.
|
Used for marine
navigation because all straight lines on the map are lines of constant
azimuth
|
Equidistant
projection is a map that is perfect for identifying antipodes. Because the
border indicates the farthest you can get from point of tangency, in this
case the South Pole.
|
Distortion types?
|
Meridians
curve gently in the top and the bottom and poles stretch, Making the points
turn into vertical as lines.
|
First, as I noted
earlier, the developed countries are represented with a proportionally larger
than they have, and this is done intentionally (or at least has no intention
correct) to ningunear poor countries. Second, and this is something that
costs me to believe it was originally said by Peters, the Mercator map gives
more weight to the northern hemisphere to the south, placing the line of
Ecuador not in the middle of the map, but a little below so that the northern
hemisphere occupies 2/3 of the surface of the map, and south 1/3.
|
This projection
distorts the relative areas, the size, the distance, the shapes and the
angles.
|
Distortion – Areas
that are more distorted?
|
So the areas more distorted are near of north and south poles.
|
A few major
misconceptions based on this map:
- Alaska is nearly
as large as the continental U.S.
- Greenland is
roughly the same size as Africa.
- Europe (excluding
Russia) is only a bit larger than South America.
- Antarctica dwarfs
all the continents.
In reality:
- Alaska can fit
inside the continental U.S. about three times.
- Greenland can fit
inside Africa about 14 times.
- South America
nearly doubles Europe's land mass.
- Antarctica looks
like the second-smallest continent.
|
Well, it depends on
the type of azimuthal projection that you decide to use. Because the
projection can come from the centre of the Earth, from the middle or from the
top, and also from outside it. For example as we said before if we choose a
map that it’s centre is the North Pole, the area which will be more distorted
is going to be the South Pole.
|
There is more than
one version?
|
NO
|
NO
|
1. Orthographic
projection: an inside of this you have also polar projection, equatorial
projection and oblique projection.
2. Stereographic
projection
3. Gnomonic
projection
4. Lambert azimuthal
projection
5. Azimuthal
equidistant projection
|
Problems?
|
Greatly
deformed along meridians and farther north than it should appears.
|
The Mercator
projection drastically distorts the size and shape of objects approaching the
poles. This may be the reason people have no idea how big some places really
are.
|
There aren’t any map
projections that preserve the three parameters, distance, size and shape, it
is impossible not to deform the Earth with this type of projection. However,
thanks to the mathematics we can make some changes that allow us to maintain
any of the parameters.
|
Socio-cultural
implications of using it as a learning resource?
|
The map is
distorted and doesn´t correspond to reality, but its distortion is necessary to
adapt the geographic reality to a cartographic projection, and this kind of
projection is easy to be explained on pupils and also our space logic can also
appreciate the distortion and easily know the reality.
|
The map is more used
to represent the globe especially by teachers and books, then all children
imagine the countries as it type of projection shows the countries.
|
An azimuthal
projection is therefore particularly suitable for small 'circular' features on
the surface of the earth.
|
lunes, 29 de febrero de 2016
TASK 2 TABLE
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario